Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-06 23:02:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E324464DA6CAB56130669A301974BAD76C1A00D405CFF1A5D7A6ABDA580F414E
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The above reply is incorrect, these are different studies even a cursory examination of the cohorts reveals this: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/andr.13181 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejendo/lvad125

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1710406261076812245
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E324464DA6CAB56130669A301974BAD76C1A00D405CFF1A5D7A6ABDA580F414E
  • createdAtMillis - 1696633363613
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1710406261076812245E324464DA6CAB56130669A301974BAD76C1A00D405CFF1A5D7A6ABDA580F414E