Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-07 23:21:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DC183FF679DAEDF2913FA152FFA8C74A1AFBB60162F4B541B7789EF5D251D765
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The above reply is incorrect, these are different studies even a cursory examination of the cohorts reveals this: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/andr.13181 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejendo/lvad125

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1710406261076812245
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DC183FF679DAEDF2913FA152FFA8C74A1AFBB60162F4B541B7789EF5D251D765
  • createdAtMillis - 1696720895277
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1710406261076812245DC183FF679DAEDF2913FA152FFA8C74A1AFBB60162F4B541B7789EF5D251D765