Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-05 09:58:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C08493633431A8C6C7612C99C43C165DEF727788ED8464F26BF4E3FD324E09D0
Participant Details

Original Note:

No evidence links a successful No vote to harm remote indigenous communities. Likewise, no proof supports improved living standards from a Yes vote. Many remote indigenous Australians and most Australians don't support the proposed voice to parliament. https://www.abc.net.au/listen/programs/abc-news-daily/why-remote-communities-haven-t-heard-of-the-voice/102556502

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1709727338101874885
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C08493633431A8C6C7612C99C43C165DEF727788ED8464F26BF4E3FD324E09D0
  • createdAtMillis - 1696499895980
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1709727338101874885C08493633431A8C6C7612C99C43C165DEF727788ED8464F26BF4E3FD324E09D0