Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-08 22:35:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5119C2A3494ADC59B5A3FBF6B00C88C30B0ABCD011DA4B6EEE2BFC358B8AAF56
Participant Details

Original Note:

No evidence links a successful No vote to harm remote indigenous communities. Likewise, no proof supports improved living standards from a Yes vote. Many remote indigenous Australians and most Australians don't support the proposed voice to parliament. https://www.abc.net.au/listen/programs/abc-news-daily/why-remote-communities-haven-t-heard-of-the-voice/102556502

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1709727338101874885
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5119C2A3494ADC59B5A3FBF6B00C88C30B0ABCD011DA4B6EEE2BFC358B8AAF56
  • createdAtMillis - 1696804512644
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17097273381018748855119C2A3494ADC59B5A3FBF6B00C88C30B0ABCD011DA4B6EEE2BFC358B8AAF56