Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-05 01:46:13 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4DE67F87E693805035394FDBE1561AE5B5CEA49D6393B5EEF282B7066B8B712D
Participant Details

Original Note:

No evidence links a successful No vote to harm remote indigenous communities. Likewise, no proof supports improved living standards from a Yes vote. Many remote indigenous Australians and most Australians don't support the proposed voice to parliament. https://www.abc.net.au/listen/programs/abc-news-daily/why-remote-communities-haven-t-heard-of-the-voice/102556502

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1709724624051696074
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4DE67F87E693805035394FDBE1561AE5B5CEA49D6393B5EEF282B7066B8B712D
  • createdAtMillis - 1696470373981
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17097246240516960744DE67F87E693805035394FDBE1561AE5B5CEA49D6393B5EEF282B7066B8B712D