Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-04 16:00:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E611C423656DF588D9C15908DEBBD80DFD873C0AD4C2872F8DB56696DAC818D2
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the source makes a claim that it was modified, its explanation doesn't go deeper than "There's evidence it was photoshopped". It fails to include any evidence of the photoshop. Upon inspection, the darks and lights in both images appear real, and the compression is correct

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1709530485347557432
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E611C423656DF588D9C15908DEBBD80DFD873C0AD4C2872F8DB56696DAC818D2
  • createdAtMillis - 1696435230810
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1709530485347557432E611C423656DF588D9C15908DEBBD80DFD873C0AD4C2872F8DB56696DAC818D2