Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-04 13:01:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D35FC67500F03167D245DEF43544732F093AF9FE30E3129E996EBE33EF21B643
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the source makes a claim that it was modified, its explanation doesn't go deeper than "There's evidence it was photoshopped". It fails to include any evidence of the photoshop. Upon inspection, the darks and lights in both images appear real, and the compression is correct

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1709530485347557432
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D35FC67500F03167D245DEF43544732F093AF9FE30E3129E996EBE33EF21B643
  • createdAtMillis - 1696424508870
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1709530485347557432D35FC67500F03167D245DEF43544732F093AF9FE30E3129E996EBE33EF21B643