Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-04 14:03:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 46288DAA2DE9330555A5EAA43C3688184E38DB026EDD346C55E052372DA200B7
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the source makes a claim that it was modified, its explanation doesn't go deeper than "There's evidence it was photoshopped". It fails to include any evidence of the photoshop. Upon inspection, the darks and lights in both images appear real, and the compression is correct

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1709530485347557432
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 46288DAA2DE9330555A5EAA43C3688184E38DB026EDD346C55E052372DA200B7
  • createdAtMillis - 1696428231403
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 170953048534755743246288DAA2DE9330555A5EAA43C3688184E38DB026EDD346C55E052372DA200B7