Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-05 09:20:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 35824F2CBB9FE854A20BC2AA4DE550CDECAEA3DB5F1F59EC1A5AD48E25BB455C
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the source makes a claim that it was modified, its explanation doesn't go deeper than "There's evidence it was photoshopped". It fails to include any evidence of the photoshop. Upon inspection, the darks and lights in both images appear real, and the compression is correct

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1709530485347557432
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 35824F2CBB9FE854A20BC2AA4DE550CDECAEA3DB5F1F59EC1A5AD48E25BB455C
  • createdAtMillis - 1696497659250
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 170953048534755743235824F2CBB9FE854A20BC2AA4DE550CDECAEA3DB5F1F59EC1A5AD48E25BB455C