Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-05 13:06:13 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F78504B6C18C577072C35735D39904D6DF9493EE0B9C92488D1F413957951263
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed. No factual wrongs here. Speculation belongs in the comments, not notes. The other note, claiming there is no visual proof of the text messages, is not backed by the Fox News article which it links to. There is no mention of it there.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1709454827246264614
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F78504B6C18C577072C35735D39904D6DF9493EE0B9C92488D1F413957951263
  • createdAtMillis - 1696511173416
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1709454827246264614F78504B6C18C577072C35735D39904D6DF9493EE0B9C92488D1F413957951263