Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-04 16:53:49 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DFF41A81C8120607D6784FA08ED6A769A03E932627BD9C8ED97CD59D5FFFB9D6
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed. No factual wrongs here. Speculation belongs in the comments, not notes. The other note, claiming there is no visual proof of the text messages, is not backed by the Fox News article which it links to. There is no mention of it there.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1709454827246264614
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DFF41A81C8120607D6784FA08ED6A769A03E932627BD9C8ED97CD59D5FFFB9D6
  • createdAtMillis - 1696438429428
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1709454827246264614DFF41A81C8120607D6784FA08ED6A769A03E932627BD9C8ED97CD59D5FFFB9D6