Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-04 09:43:10 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C23D11F98EF536A76834B52EE89B3838D7005370D70BCF6C4B1876219F6FE118
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed. No factual wrongs here. Speculation belongs in the comments, not notes. The other note, claiming there is no visual proof of the text messages, is not backed by the Fox News article which it links to. There is no mention of it there.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1709454827246264614
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C23D11F98EF536A76834B52EE89B3838D7005370D70BCF6C4B1876219F6FE118
  • createdAtMillis - 1696412590762
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1709454827246264614C23D11F98EF536A76834B52EE89B3838D7005370D70BCF6C4B1876219F6FE118