Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-04 13:52:58 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A2AEB5CA9E524DE89143F64D80405904C68C7F9E291EDAD4103F496FF53C0485
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed. No factual wrongs here. Speculation belongs in the comments, not notes. The other note, claiming there is no visual proof of the text messages, is not backed by the Fox News article which it links to. There is no mention of it there.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1709454827246264614
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A2AEB5CA9E524DE89143F64D80405904C68C7F9E291EDAD4103F496FF53C0485
  • createdAtMillis - 1696427578770
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1709454827246264614A2AEB5CA9E524DE89143F64D80405904C68C7F9E291EDAD4103F496FF53C0485