Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-04 16:38:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1E4A57A8F1FAB52DE685E1D36F3DC04F5F9C60161F1669406832FD3EE985A872
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed. No factual wrongs here. Speculation belongs in the comments, not notes. The other note, claiming there is no visual proof of the text messages, is not backed by the Fox News article which it links to. There is no mention of it there.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1709454827246264614
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1E4A57A8F1FAB52DE685E1D36F3DC04F5F9C60161F1669406832FD3EE985A872
  • createdAtMillis - 1696437498072
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17094548272462646141E4A57A8F1FAB52DE685E1D36F3DC04F5F9C60161F1669406832FD3EE985A872