Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-03 16:25:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EE06CA31D025062833A4FF8D33655D25A82F0B4D6622575C1AF7657CDEBA8623
Participant Details

Original Note:

The official detailed US response for voting against can be found here. In brief: * multiple inappropriate topics for of this type of resolution * distracts or ignores regional conflict as a major source of food insecurity * asserts extraterritorial obligations on the USA https://geneva.usmission.gov/2017/03/24/u-s-explanation-of-vote-on-the-right-to-food/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1709239856319148321
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EE06CA31D025062833A4FF8D33655D25A82F0B4D6622575C1AF7657CDEBA8623
  • createdAtMillis - 1696350345506
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1709239856319148321EE06CA31D025062833A4FF8D33655D25A82F0B4D6622575C1AF7657CDEBA8623