Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-03 22:19:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5D8EC2236902C9BEC864DDAF556572F4ED9AD26CC8FE9B844CE2F23ECA4F5237
Participant Details

Original Note:

The official detailed US response for voting against can be found here. In brief: * multiple inappropriate topics for of this type of resolution * distracts or ignores regional conflict as a major source of food insecurity * asserts extraterritorial obligations on the USA https://geneva.usmission.gov/2017/03/24/u-s-explanation-of-vote-on-the-right-to-food/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1709239856319148321
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5D8EC2236902C9BEC864DDAF556572F4ED9AD26CC8FE9B844CE2F23ECA4F5237
  • createdAtMillis - 1696371591977
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17092398563191483215D8EC2236902C9BEC864DDAF556572F4ED9AD26CC8FE9B844CE2F23ECA4F5237