Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-03 16:32:36 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1A210B1D57813705001B34634C59D52386BF421581FEC144EBD730CAD79E71DD
Participant Details

Original Note:

Impossible de dire qui est 'victime' pcq le thread ne montre qu'une partie de la conversation. Le C.pén. est clair : violation du secret des correspondance (partager de conversation sans accord de la pers. avec qui vous échangez) + atteinte à l'intimité de la vie privée. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/id/LEGISCTA000006165309/ https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/section_lc/LEGITEXT000006070719/LEGISCTA000006165309/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1709212058443513974
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1A210B1D57813705001B34634C59D52386BF421581FEC144EBD730CAD79E71DD
  • createdAtMillis - 1696350756727
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17092120584435139741A210B1D57813705001B34634C59D52386BF421581FEC144EBD730CAD79E71DD