Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-03 16:16:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EB0A7EBCEB0B62A08B77AFDB2AA8D244B5D5041C1535C0EF4EA9B3F845E40198
Participant Details

Original Note:

Il convient de preciser, d’une part, que les personnes étant âgées de plus de 16 ans, et d’autre part, consentant lors des échanges privées litigieux, le présent thread est de nature à constituer le délit de « revenge porn »¹. ¹ : https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/article_lc/LEGIARTI000033207318 Explications complémentaires : https://www.village-justice.com/articles/lutter-contre-revenge-porn,41272.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1709162379714420871
participantId -
raterParticipantId - EB0A7EBCEB0B62A08B77AFDB2AA8D244B5D5041C1535C0EF4EA9B3F845E40198
createdAtMillis - 1696349808473
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1709162379714420871EB0A7EBCEB0B62A08B77AFDB2AA8D244B5D5041C1535C0EF4EA9B3F845E40198