Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-03 21:30:57 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 32E06FF31A04ECA310232363DED011F4625326F4CAF017A764CDA3DC0E98FB55
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed note cites RCOG published opinions. It is part of the poster's claim that these bodies are not unbiased/disinterested. Their trustworthiness is one of the matters in dispute. So this is more suited to discussion in the comments rather than CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1709145881734181199
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 32E06FF31A04ECA310232363DED011F4625326F4CAF017A764CDA3DC0E98FB55
  • createdAtMillis - 1696368657934
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 170914588173418119932E06FF31A04ECA310232363DED011F4625326F4CAF017A764CDA3DC0E98FB55