Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-03 06:08:39 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E1AC16C7B5A8555141131B85FF8F4BE0CEF36AB3ED083AD9A390B6C8CD1A80FB
Participant Details

Original Note:

This claim is false. The Trump legal team raised an objection based on their interpretation of a prior appellate ruling, but as of Monday evening, the judge "has not dismissed any portion of the attorney general’s case." https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/10/02/trump-fraud-trial-ny-2

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1709012022170357878
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E1AC16C7B5A8555141131B85FF8F4BE0CEF36AB3ED083AD9A390B6C8CD1A80FB
  • createdAtMillis - 1696313319891
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1709012022170357878E1AC16C7B5A8555141131B85FF8F4BE0CEF36AB3ED083AD9A390B6C8CD1A80FB