Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-03 09:33:42 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B1D500C64FAF6822603D4F03782E1AB122387D97303B6F67C99D3395D4E7A89C
Participant Details

Original Note:

This claim is false. The Trump legal team raised an objection based on their interpretation of a prior appellate ruling, but as of Monday evening, the judge "has not dismissed any portion of the attorney general’s case." https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/10/02/trump-fraud-trial-ny-2

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1709012022170357878
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B1D500C64FAF6822603D4F03782E1AB122387D97303B6F67C99D3395D4E7A89C
  • createdAtMillis - 1696325622697
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1709012022170357878B1D500C64FAF6822603D4F03782E1AB122387D97303B6F67C99D3395D4E7A89C