Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-02 23:17:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D261E8BD400870B0A2376A6E883FC8ADAC3AD191D75F6CE7DA1212A4367C5630
Participant Details

Original Note:

This claim is false. The Trump legal team raised an objection based on their interpretation of a prior appellate ruling, but as of Monday evening, the judge "has not dismissed any portion of the attorney general’s case." https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/10/02/trump-fraud-trial-ny-2/#link-AMRYN6GCH5G7JF6FPCM7GN36M4

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1708971937517506928
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D261E8BD400870B0A2376A6E883FC8ADAC3AD191D75F6CE7DA1212A4367C5630
  • createdAtMillis - 1696288677130
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1708971937517506928D261E8BD400870B0A2376A6E883FC8ADAC3AD191D75F6CE7DA1212A4367C5630