Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-03 13:54:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 538C7263580F9453EC9DDBB43593ECBF8A2F63B12FF2A43D1CE1B3AEBBBD6544
Participant Details

Original Note:

This claim is false. The Trump legal team raised an objection based on their interpretation of a prior appellate ruling, but as of Monday evening, the judge "has not dismissed any portion of the attorney general’s case." https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/10/02/trump-fraud-trial-ny-2/#link-AMRYN6GCH5G7JF6FPCM7GN36M4

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1708971937517506928
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 538C7263580F9453EC9DDBB43593ECBF8A2F63B12FF2A43D1CE1B3AEBBBD6544
  • createdAtMillis - 1696341291226
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1708971937517506928538C7263580F9453EC9DDBB43593ECBF8A2F63B12FF2A43D1CE1B3AEBBBD6544