Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-02 20:14:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CD530B9A48213FA26513ACE65F3F3F782FD74EB16526B7BAC8C74FB76D193807
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Persons Case did not decide that women were persons instead of property, but whether they were considered "qualified persons" for the purpose of Senate appointments. The court thought it obvious and explicit that women were persons. The case hinged on "qualified." http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/1929/1929_86.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1708891489428701636
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CD530B9A48213FA26513ACE65F3F3F782FD74EB16526B7BAC8C74FB76D193807
  • createdAtMillis - 1696277670398
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1708891489428701636CD530B9A48213FA26513ACE65F3F3F782FD74EB16526B7BAC8C74FB76D193807