Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-02 19:53:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 77E3EA3ABC06632F74DB12CAB76BCACAB56DEC3171C7CB79A12CE49CE26720C6
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Persons Case did not decide that women were persons instead of property, but whether they were considered "qualified persons" for the purpose of Senate appointments. The court thought it obvious and explicit that women were persons. The case hinged on "qualified." http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/1929/1929_86.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1708891489428701636
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 77E3EA3ABC06632F74DB12CAB76BCACAB56DEC3171C7CB79A12CE49CE26720C6
  • createdAtMillis - 1696276422243
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 170889148942870163677E3EA3ABC06632F74DB12CAB76BCACAB56DEC3171C7CB79A12CE49CE26720C6