Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-02 18:49:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 659550F8EDB11F59C1CD0BC6662DDF2F8006ECACB496DDAC594F2F87D710F55C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Persons Case did not decide that women were persons instead of property, but whether they were considered "qualified persons" for the purpose of Senate appointments. The court thought it obvious and explicit that women were persons. The case hinged on "qualified." http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/1929/1929_86.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1708891489428701636
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 659550F8EDB11F59C1CD0BC6662DDF2F8006ECACB496DDAC594F2F87D710F55C
  • createdAtMillis - 1696272572244
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1708891489428701636659550F8EDB11F59C1CD0BC6662DDF2F8006ECACB496DDAC594F2F87D710F55C