Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-02 18:26:23 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1D141E4865E26624461C66D8208571CB9E95B76EE88939251C5E42576E1A9C30
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Persons Case did not decide that women were persons instead of property, but whether they were considered "qualified persons" for the purpose of Senate appointments. The court thought it obvious and explicit that women were persons. The case hinged on "qualified." http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/1929/1929_86.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1708891489428701636
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1D141E4865E26624461C66D8208571CB9E95B76EE88939251C5E42576E1A9C30
  • createdAtMillis - 1696271183548
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17088914894287016361D141E4865E26624461C66D8208571CB9E95B76EE88939251C5E42576E1A9C30