Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-02 16:33:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CC1ACF5BBA8C55306A2ECC76F269445B723A983002A34FC6D64AC0355482139C
Participant Details

Original Note:

De tekst van de motie van Van der Plas c.s. bevatte geen concreet dekkingsvoorstel anders dan dat de dekking moest plaatsvinden “uit via [sic] de uitgavenkant”. Verder vermelde de motie niet met hoeveel het minimumloon zou moeten stijgen (“enigszins”) en wat dit zou kosten. https://www.tweedekamer.nl/downloads/document?id=2023D38288

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1708880610691895439
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CC1ACF5BBA8C55306A2ECC76F269445B723A983002A34FC6D64AC0355482139C
  • createdAtMillis - 1696264406694
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1708880610691895439CC1ACF5BBA8C55306A2ECC76F269445B723A983002A34FC6D64AC0355482139C