Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-02 16:57:19 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8113DC89188DC2759FDCB6E87239D069078231C3E1164BB251C37F0D05C5343B
Participant Details

Original Note:

De tekst van de motie van Van der Plas c.s. bevatte geen concreet dekkingsvoorstel anders dan dat de dekking moest plaatsvinden “uit via [sic] de uitgavenkant”. Verder vermelde de motie niet met hoeveel het minimumloon zou moeten stijgen (“enigszins”) en wat dit zou kosten. https://www.tweedekamer.nl/downloads/document?id=2023D38288

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1708880610691895439
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8113DC89188DC2759FDCB6E87239D069078231C3E1164BB251C37F0D05C5343B
  • createdAtMillis - 1696265839747
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17088806106918954398113DC89188DC2759FDCB6E87239D069078231C3E1164BB251C37F0D05C5343B