Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-02 22:38:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4C63274911EFF9C19BF80AA16E6E5272FBD32F51EC20BB9A5D7A010E8712583F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ophihicus has not been included in Astrology since it's inception in the second millenium BC. “We see your comments about a zodiac story that re-emerges every few years,” [NASA] wrote in a tweet. “No, we did not change the zodiac.” https://time.com/5867647/nasa-zodiac-star/ https://twitter.com/NASA/status/1283918088723935234?t=755et2_z4Fdfiz3LM6kdlg&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1708708901234135185
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4C63274911EFF9C19BF80AA16E6E5272FBD32F51EC20BB9A5D7A010E8712583F
  • createdAtMillis - 1696286339045
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17087089012341351854C63274911EFF9C19BF80AA16E6E5272FBD32F51EC20BB9A5D7A010E8712583F