Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-02 08:35:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FD6C22010B18025F0CE05174CB355B94C8E1518C264DBB790A89B1D7C399642E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Important context - the study is based on a sample size of 2008 people: https://d3nkl3psvxxpe9.cloudfront.net/documents/TheTimes_Amenities_230223.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1708591603185598893
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FD6C22010B18025F0CE05174CB355B94C8E1518C264DBB790A89B1D7C399642E
  • createdAtMillis - 1696235740361
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1708591603185598893FD6C22010B18025F0CE05174CB355B94C8E1518C264DBB790A89B1D7C399642E