Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-02 06:16:13 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 213046F79F5778298C64D1237BF65217EF2B59CC04BD1CA3A7F04092A174B9D0
Participant Details

Original Note:

Important context - the study is based on a sample size of 2008 people: https://d3nkl3psvxxpe9.cloudfront.net/documents/TheTimes_Amenities_230223.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1708591603185598893
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 213046F79F5778298C64D1237BF65217EF2B59CC04BD1CA3A7F04092A174B9D0
  • createdAtMillis - 1696227373966
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1708591603185598893213046F79F5778298C64D1237BF65217EF2B59CC04BD1CA3A7F04092A174B9D0