Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-10-02 07:49:11 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: AEF566A9EFEED0E9F9A08B569DC5E627F0470A743AF7BB5BBE90713A2696C828
Participant Details
Original Note:
Article falsely states that Forstater judgment called GC beliefs “profoundly offensive and distressing”. Instead, the judgment said [116] BOTH GC beliefs AND the author’s beliefs “may well be [p.o & d] to many others” but [118a] did not comment on merit of either belief. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/60c1cce1d3bf7f4bd9814e39/Maya_Forstater_v_CGD_Europe_and_others_UKEAT0105_20_JOJ.pdf
All Note Details