Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-01 00:42:46 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EBFAC89E34895F78EF36466CC41F1CEAB4DD1CF09A85DFCF287A6AFB939E085D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Last month's numbers do not refute a US Congress members claim. They may have access to info that has not been released. Absense of evidence is not evidence of absense. We will have to wait until it is released and compare. Apprehension rate is not related to encounters at all.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1708264860507906374
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EBFAC89E34895F78EF36466CC41F1CEAB4DD1CF09A85DFCF287A6AFB939E085D
  • createdAtMillis - 1696120966089
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1708264860507906374EBFAC89E34895F78EF36466CC41F1CEAB4DD1CF09A85DFCF287A6AFB939E085D