Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-01 19:00:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B633F1D871762D43D3F09BF6DCBBA1B2BE483A6B2D1DA9BC14BF92E7851C0B4F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Last month's numbers do not refute a US Congress members claim. They may have access to info that has not been released. Absense of evidence is not evidence of absense. We will have to wait until it is released and compare. Apprehension rate is not related to encounters at all.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1708264860507906374
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B633F1D871762D43D3F09BF6DCBBA1B2BE483A6B2D1DA9BC14BF92E7851C0B4F
  • createdAtMillis - 1696186826177
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1708264860507906374B633F1D871762D43D3F09BF6DCBBA1B2BE483A6B2D1DA9BC14BF92E7851C0B4F