Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-01 09:52:57 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A4E2048B16AC7C4B246588F5BE6D347973653960661E6A3F0CB1E56E26E8C709
Participant Details

Original Note:

Last month's numbers do not refute a US Congress members claim. They may have access to info that has not been released. Absense of evidence is not evidence of absense. We will have to wait until it is released and compare. Apprehension rate is not related to encounters at all.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1708264860507906374
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A4E2048B16AC7C4B246588F5BE6D347973653960661E6A3F0CB1E56E26E8C709
  • createdAtMillis - 1696153977044
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1708264860507906374A4E2048B16AC7C4B246588F5BE6D347973653960661E6A3F0CB1E56E26E8C709