Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-01 11:23:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5E294F45B0A81E8EFCC4C8B0FE92ED1336253B73EAB3C1BD4EA5E426FCC63ACD
Participant Details

Original Note:

Last month's numbers do not refute a US Congress members claim. They may have access to info that has not been released. Absense of evidence is not evidence of absense. We will have to wait until it is released and compare. Apprehension rate is not related to encounters at all.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1708264860507906374
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5E294F45B0A81E8EFCC4C8B0FE92ED1336253B73EAB3C1BD4EA5E426FCC63ACD
  • createdAtMillis - 1696159423875
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17082648605079063745E294F45B0A81E8EFCC4C8B0FE92ED1336253B73EAB3C1BD4EA5E426FCC63ACD