Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-01 16:52:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0B37DDD8004FF5D58F83703375F1A10BAD52CD09F8E4DAB9148B5E142B5F413C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Last month's numbers do not refute a US Congress members claim. They may have access to info that has not been released. Absense of evidence is not evidence of absense. We will have to wait until it is released and compare. Apprehension rate is not related to encounters at all.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1708264860507906374
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0B37DDD8004FF5D58F83703375F1A10BAD52CD09F8E4DAB9148B5E142B5F413C
  • createdAtMillis - 1696179157418
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17082648605079063740B37DDD8004FF5D58F83703375F1A10BAD52CD09F8E4DAB9148B5E142B5F413C