Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-01 12:14:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4A471754BCD5C105189FA902B63BFC2348762CA48B097D5F88A2085ED77FB035
Participant Details

Original Note:

Contrary to the speculation in the proposed note, the study referenced in the post does exist: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19419899.2017.1328459

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1708264095705874469
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4A471754BCD5C105189FA902B63BFC2348762CA48B097D5F88A2085ED77FB035
  • createdAtMillis - 1696162452120
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17082640957058744694A471754BCD5C105189FA902B63BFC2348762CA48B097D5F88A2085ED77FB035