Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-01 08:50:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9F5CCBAA52957DB930FD7AAF178F7AA37B75ED15A6874038FE93D69CD7E0720D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN The note is incorrect. As per its linked article he was charged with malicious wounding. For which he was acquitted. And discharging a gun in a building. For which he was found guilty. While the obvious joke isn't true. The note itself is more misleading.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1708251733883809823
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9F5CCBAA52957DB930FD7AAF178F7AA37B75ED15A6874038FE93D69CD7E0720D
  • createdAtMillis - 1696150232532
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17082517338838098239F5CCBAA52957DB930FD7AAF178F7AA37B75ED15A6874038FE93D69CD7E0720D