Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-30 12:40:42 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C16449B0A4BA0BB95F7B9A80F9F07AE9B4ECBC6D03AF2BDE9E4CCB66BD8CF558
Participant Details

Original Note:

The photo is misleading. The ‘reconstruction’ was limited to facial structure. The linked website states that “Scientists were not able to recover any DNA from her remains, however, so her skin, eye, and hair color are unknown.”. https://t.co/ZqQ2rx4lH7

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1708093716513333530
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C16449B0A4BA0BB95F7B9A80F9F07AE9B4ECBC6D03AF2BDE9E4CCB66BD8CF558
  • createdAtMillis - 1696077642017
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1708093716513333530C16449B0A4BA0BB95F7B9A80F9F07AE9B4ECBC6D03AF2BDE9E4CCB66BD8CF558