Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-30 14:08:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A0C2C9CA5F1F3EDA5AE1075B6E65AA6BEFABCE61F6253400F8F576F5DC707127
Participant Details

Original Note:

The photo is misleading. The ‘reconstruction’ was limited to facial structure. The linked website states that “Scientists were not able to recover any DNA from her remains, however, so her skin, eye, and hair color are unknown.”. https://t.co/ZqQ2rx4lH7

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1708093716513333530
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A0C2C9CA5F1F3EDA5AE1075B6E65AA6BEFABCE61F6253400F8F576F5DC707127
  • createdAtMillis - 1696082921669
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1708093716513333530A0C2C9CA5F1F3EDA5AE1075B6E65AA6BEFABCE61F6253400F8F576F5DC707127