Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-30 13:39:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4549C5881A7C53CFC1EE6D0E3F80C1B92D0982BB2321321652547EF20EFE508E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The photo is misleading. The ‘reconstruction’ was limited to facial structure. The linked website states that “Scientists were not able to recover any DNA from her remains, however, so her skin, eye, and hair color are unknown.”. https://t.co/ZqQ2rx4lH7

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1708093716513333530
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4549C5881A7C53CFC1EE6D0E3F80C1B92D0982BB2321321652547EF20EFE508E
  • createdAtMillis - 1696081147056
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17080937165133335304549C5881A7C53CFC1EE6D0E3F80C1B92D0982BB2321321652547EF20EFE508E