Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-30 04:35:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F4B66B1E3F312A06245D6902D0C715DEE3A7737FA846A6204B7A7AFF3A7BEEAA
Participant Details

Original Note:

El saldo arbitral no indica que un arbitro haya decidido perjudicar al Real Madrid. No se muestran pruebas de las fallas que supuestamente el arbitrio cometiĆ³, emite un juicio desde la subjetividad.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1707924040977940487
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F4B66B1E3F312A06245D6902D0C715DEE3A7737FA846A6204B7A7AFF3A7BEEAA
  • createdAtMillis - 1696048548926
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1707924040977940487F4B66B1E3F312A06245D6902D0C715DEE3A7737FA846A6204B7A7AFF3A7BEEAA