Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-29 23:09:44 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CA8C00EF3CEBED810AE74A67EC0BD56550C26A53C11D8F81CAA3FDFB2CA1CC9B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. She is expressing her opinion, which is being dealt with in the comments and possibly by a lawyer. Note that she is NOT saying Sangita has been found guilty of wrongdoing by Ofcom, she is saying Ofcom didn't get enough reports about Sangita.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1707854389057089724
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CA8C00EF3CEBED810AE74A67EC0BD56550C26A53C11D8F81CAA3FDFB2CA1CC9B
  • createdAtMillis - 1696028984283
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1707854389057089724CA8C00EF3CEBED810AE74A67EC0BD56550C26A53C11D8F81CAA3FDFB2CA1CC9B