Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-29 21:11:16 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AB0267B3C9D209645552BE25CA531CEFAC92CB41EB07CA1E9B80138B5735C30D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. She is expressing her opinion, which is being dealt with in the comments and possibly by a lawyer. Note that she is NOT saying Sangita has been found guilty of wrongdoing by Ofcom, she is saying Ofcom didn't get enough reports about Sangita.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1707854389057089724
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AB0267B3C9D209645552BE25CA531CEFAC92CB41EB07CA1E9B80138B5735C30D
  • createdAtMillis - 1696021876033
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1707854389057089724AB0267B3C9D209645552BE25CA531CEFAC92CB41EB07CA1E9B80138B5735C30D