Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-29 20:58:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8B7A843EEC33109C691FA3D5F7E3AE9D768FED34BA29A04D4AA1378E08170E62
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. She is expressing her opinion, which is being dealt with in the comments and possibly by a lawyer. Note that she is NOT saying Sangita has been found guilty of wrongdoing by Ofcom, she is saying Ofcom didn't get enough reports about Sangita.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1707854389057089724
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8B7A843EEC33109C691FA3D5F7E3AE9D768FED34BA29A04D4AA1378E08170E62
  • createdAtMillis - 1696021098218
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17078543890570897248B7A843EEC33109C691FA3D5F7E3AE9D768FED34BA29A04D4AA1378E08170E62