Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-29 21:39:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E2DB1AF8B285204B1939C6B1E9204AD77BF20A3B9A49E51A81EC627BAD0E46A9
Participant Details

Original Note:

A search from Google and the WSJ doesn't back this up with any source, reliable nor unreliable, I would suggest that OP has made this up entirely

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1707801481410203992
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E2DB1AF8B285204B1939C6B1E9204AD77BF20A3B9A49E51A81EC627BAD0E46A9
  • createdAtMillis - 1696023562879
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1707801481410203992E2DB1AF8B285204B1939C6B1E9204AD77BF20A3B9A49E51A81EC627BAD0E46A9