Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-29 09:39:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BDC1C03FC99C7B0AED472D20294EC0A65F0822431589D1A6E114C5EC5E71B835
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed. The author is clearly using a rhetorical device to explain their objection to the power of lobbyist agencies in Australia.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1707662963904274776
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BDC1C03FC99C7B0AED472D20294EC0A65F0822431589D1A6E114C5EC5E71B835
  • createdAtMillis - 1695980376392
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1707662963904274776BDC1C03FC99C7B0AED472D20294EC0A65F0822431589D1A6E114C5EC5E71B835