Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-28 18:39:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 122D7A8766D6F75CCD2D56D940942F440B9195EF577A7D57FFE661A76E0983E1
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Dos personas discuten sobre política. Discusión semántica sobre términos abstractos o de interpretación. Se acusan, se injurian, se responden mutuamente y se repostean. Entonces, cualquier aclaración es la propia discusión, una interpretación, y no es contexto. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/es/contributing/examples

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1707426202938400901
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 122D7A8766D6F75CCD2D56D940942F440B9195EF577A7D57FFE661A76E0983E1
  • createdAtMillis - 1695926349411
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1707426202938400901122D7A8766D6F75CCD2D56D940942F440B9195EF577A7D57FFE661A76E0983E1